| 项目 | 内容 |
|---|
| 题型 | Agree/Disagree（观点类） |
| 话题 | 政府类/健康类 - 广告监管与公共健康 |
| 关键词 | government, ban, advertisements, unhealthy food, children |
| 考察能力 | 评估政府干预市场和保护公共健康的边界 |
【开头段】
├── 背景：rising obesity rates
├── 让步：reservations about outright bans
├── 立场：significant restrictions justified
└── 重点：especially aimed at children
【主体段1 - 支持限制】
├── 论点1：advertising works（companies spend billions）
├── 论点2：children vulnerable（lack cognitive ability）
├── 后果：lifelong health problems, healthcare costs
└── 正当性：demonstrable public harm → regulation legitimate
【主体段2 - 反对禁止的担忧】
├── 担忧1：free speech, government overreach
├── 担忧2：parents' responsibility
├── 担忧3：defining "unhealthy" contentious
├── 担忧4：advertising moves to social media
└── 担忧5：limited effect without other measures
【主体段3 - 折中方案】
├── 立场：targeted restrictions, not absolute bans
├── 针对儿童：prohibit specifically aimed at children
├── 针对成人：health warnings, restrict misleading claims
└── 综合策略：education, labelling, economic factors
【结尾段】
├── 重申：stop short of complete ban
├── 支持：robust restrictions justified
└── 有力结尾：freedom should not extend to manipulating
| 词汇/短语 | 含义 | 用法示例 |
|---|
| outright ban | 完全禁止 | reservations about outright bans |
| calorie-dense, nutrient-poor | 高热量低营养 | calorie-dense, nutrient-poor products |
| persuasive intent | 说服意图 | recognise advertising's persuasive intent |
| demonstrable public harm | 可证明的公共危害 | when advertising causes demonstrable harm |
| government overreach | 政府越权 | questions about government overreach |
| proportionate | 相称的，成比例的 | more proportionate than prohibition |
| comprehensive strategy | 综合策略 | part of a comprehensive strategy |
| stop short of | 不至于，差一点 | I stop short of endorsing |
| 原句 | 可迁移到 |
|---|
| "particularly vulnerable" + "lack cognitive ability" | 儿童保护、老年人、消费者权益话题 |
| "demonstrable public harm" | 任何需要证明监管正当性的话题 |
| "targeted restrictions rather than absolute bans" | 任何需要折中方案的政策话题 |
| "part of a comprehensive strategy" | 需要综合方案的话题 |
| "freedom should not extend to manipulating" | 言论自由、商业自由边界话题 |
